Previous
editorials
Current editorial
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016 (supplement)
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
December supplement
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
December 2012
November 2012
|
 |
 |
 |

These are regular editorials
produced alongside the corresponding issues on Nonviolent
News. |
The Ryan report on child abuse (“The Commission to
Enquire into Child Abuse” looking at institutions in the Republic) has been
covered in great detail in most of the Irish media so we will not attempt to
deal with all the issues arising. However, in that it relates to violence of
many kinds inflicted on tens of thousands of children over many decades, with brutal
implications for them and their families, we cannot ignore it. If the 1916
Rising Proclamation can be considered a foundational document of the state
which was to emerge in the ‘South’ some five years later, how could it be that
reality was so far removed from “cherishing all the children of the nation
equally’?
There are many reasons. The times that were in it can help
to explain some of those reasons but it cannot excuse them. Economic
times were hard but that does not explain sheer cruelty and sexual abuse on a
terrible scale. The power of the Catholic Church, at the height of its
ultramontanist period which began in the mid- to latter part of the nineteenth
century, meant that questioning anything or anyone in authority was difficult
and often impossible. The associated strict moral piety meant that those who
were seen to have sinned, or be the product of sinfulness, could be regarded as
less than full people – ignoring a basic Christian principle that ‘everyone has
sinned’. This was a recipe for disaster when it came to the state’s most
vulnerable people, children in institutions, when the state never challenged
the institutions in question to be properly answerable to it. Many of these
children were the poorest of the poor, orphans, or with a parent or parents who
were unable to cope well for some reason; this meant that many had no support
or advocate. ‘Total’ institutions like these are the world for their inmates;
it was often a harsh, unyielding, unforgiving and violent world, from which escape
might prove impossible – even when the children had left.
The Catholic Church, which through various arms and orders
ran most of these institutions, has gradually been putting up its hands and
admitting its wrongs in this area. But the response has been slow and
inconsistent. The state, which turned a blind eye to great cruelty, which
it was betimes told about directly, was the body ultimately responsible for the
system and overseeing the system. It failed abjectly. It deferred to the
power of the Catholic Church rather than act on behalf of the vulnerable whose
existence the institutions concerned were ostensibly to serve.
Conservative social mores, reinforced as the state established itself during
the 1920s, meant that challenging the status quo became extremely
difficult. And humanity went out the window. It should be pointed
out that there were cases of abuse in Protestant institutions as well though
nothing on the scale of the Catholic ones.
The gruesome detail given by former inmates of these
institutions is harrowing. Regular beatings and severe emotional or sexual
abuse were bound to leave lasting marks on the humanity of those who suffered
and their ability to make their own way in the world and form, and sustain,
close relationships. Ordinary human feelings were distorted in many ways.
Sometimes it is a bizarre detail that speaks volumes, like the child called to
the office of the institution and told their mother had died – and they
actually felt relief because it meant they weren’t about to get a beating. Thus
far had humanity been perverted by society, church and state in an unholy
alliance which left no room for ordinary human emotion.
Questions of compensation and reparation have been to the
fore considering an ill-advised government deal made by an outgoing Fianna Fail
government which indemnified religious orders against paying more than what
would now seem is about 10% of the total compensation bill. Enraged
public opinion has now forced the religious orders to reconsider this and to
offer more; exactly how much, and how the compensation will be paid, has yet to
be worked out.
There are very few people who spoke out against the abuses
which took place. Those that did were ignored or vilified. If the past is
another country then the past represented by this experience is not one that we
want to visit again. But there are echoes of this neglect by the state in the
fact that 6,500 children in the Republic currently considered to be at risk
have not even got a social worker assigned to them. The services available for
children and young people in trouble with the law in the Republic are appalling
– a fact known for many years. There are some issues too important to have the
recession bandied about as an excuse, and this situation is no different from
when the Celtic Tiger was in full swing. So do not be surprised if our
children look back in years to come in horror that the state should be so lax
in its monitoring of children at risk that it effectively facilitated abuse and
neglect happening. We are not advocating over-intervention by social
workers but if the situation of children considered to be at risk is not even
monitored, what hope of help is there for these children?
We all make mistakes. The systemic abuse of children which
took place in the institutions concerned was more than a mistake, it was the
product of a system which allowed abuse. Accountability and checks on any kind
of power in society are essential. The point for the future is to ensure that
children are as well protected as they can reasonably be, but also as well
supported in their development as possible. Failures in this regard are not
just continuing to inflict violence on children but stunting their growth and
potential, again with ramifications for their and our future. It is,
literally, a crying shame, and it is also, and tragically, an ongoing crying
shame.
Larry Speight brings us his monthly column:
The word ‘revolution’ is in common usage in our newspapers.
It is even used by that staunch defender of the establishment The Daily
Telegraph. Not so long ago it was widely considered an unsavoury word, sullied
by those who use violence as a means of trying to change the political status
quo. In the face of the collapse of public confidence in our institutions the
word is used in a positive sense, expressing the desire for a new political
order based on transparency, accountability, equity and compassionate concern
for ‘the other’ as well as nonhuman nature. Steven Chu, the US Energy Secretary
used the ‘r’ word in a manner one would expect of a Che Guevara figure when he
called for a revolution around the world at a meeting hosted by the Prince of
Wales in London in late May. He was of course talking about climate change and
energy use.
The deeply and widely felt desire for a revolution arises
out of the recent publication of reports that have had a traumatic effect on
the public conscience. There are the ongoing revelations that British MP’s have
unashamedly abused their expenses allowances. Just before this came to light
the London Metropolitan Police was accused of brutally attacking peaceful
demonstrators at the G20 Summit. MI5 have recently been implicated in the
torture of British citizens abroad.
In the Irish Republic the torture and enslavement of
generations of children by the Catholic Church was exposed in the Ryan report.
The torture and enslavement of these children, which is how an editorial in The
Irish Times described the abuse, was carried out with the complicity of the
Department of Education, the Garda, health trusts, successive governments and
the communities in which the Catholic institutions were based. There was the
well publicised case of the death of Baby P (Peter) which exposed the oft
ineffectiveness of the Social Services. Discontent with the Social Services and
the Family Court appears to be widespread across these islands as illustrated
in the letters page in the Fermanagh Herald in three successive weeks. The main
complaint from fathers is that these institutions are not impartial because
their default position is that fathers are irrelevant in the lives of their
children. This ignores the research findings on children’s wellbeing.
A close reading of the history and behaviour of many of
those calling for a revolution tells us that they don’t really mean what they
say. While Steven Chu may use the language of a Che Guevara figure he is
supporting the construction of new-coal-powered electricity plants in the United States, after initially saying he would not permit their construction. He also
supports the construction of new nuclear power plants (except in Iran and North Korea) which will leave a legacy of environmental problems for future generations to
contend with. David Cameron, possibly the next British prime minister, has used
the ‘r’ word, but does not favour proportional representation which is the one
real way of giving a voice to the mosaic of groups that make up modern society.
An ‘r’ word that carries as much potency as revolution is
responsibility. As the discovery of Ida, the 47 million year old fossil found
in Germany in 1983 shows, all life-forms share the same origins, which means we
are responsible for each other and the nonhuman world. We will have a
revolution, in the positive sense, when we fully accept our responsibilities. A
good first step would be to follow the revolutionary edict: “Do onto others as
you would wish them do onto you.” ‘Others’ includes the community of
life-forms we share the planet with.
|