Loading

Previous editorials

Current editorial

October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017

December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016 (supplement)

December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015

December supplement
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014

December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013

December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012

December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011

December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010

December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008

December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006

December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005

December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004

December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
July 200
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002

December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000

16 Ravensdene Park,
Belfast BT6 0DA,
Northern Ireland.
Tel: 028 9064 7106
Fax: 028 9064 7106
Email

 

What's new

Nonviolence News October 2017t

Editorial: Democracy in Northern Ireland

Eco-Awareness with Larry Speight: Cogntitive revolution

Readings in Nonviolence: Compassion and Compassionate Integrity Training

Eco-Awareness with Larry Speight: Appreciating nonhuman nature

Readings in Nonviolence: Disarming the nuclear argument

 

Editorials

These are regular editorials produced alongside the corresponding issues on Nonviolent News.

Issue 114: November 2003

Not Quite a Government Once Again

[Return to related issues of Nonviolent News.]

Efforts falling at the final hurdle, Northern Ireland may have approaching elections but no prospect of a return to devolved government in the immediate future. It looked like it was going to be a synchronised swimming display. Instead we got a lot of thrashing about in the water and the risk of people drowning.

Tuesday 21st October promised fair. Elections were announced by the British government for 26th November, Gerry Adams made his statement (“We are opposed to any use or threat of force for any political purpose” etc) and then General John de Chastelain did his thing, speaking about the IRA putting a substantial and significant quantity of weapons beyond use. But the Ulster Unionist weren’t convinced by a report which did not have the detail they wanted and David Trimble announced they wouldn’t proceed. So arose the difficult situation for moderate Unionists of going into an election (to the NI Assembly) with no deal under their belt. Undoubtedly the latter situation is good news for the anti-Agreement Unionists and the DUP/Democratic Unionist Party. But the results may not prove to be as traumatic as feared.

Ulster Unionists feel that they have been conned before with promises of IRA disarmament which didn’t amount to a hill of beans let alone explosives. The feel there was no indication of where they are in the disarmament process. It seems it was a case of the IRA’s maximum being less than the Unionists’ minimum; possibly for a number of reasons, including avoiding any stigma of defeat or capitulation, the IRA was unwilling to give more details than that relayed by de Chastelain. The Unionists, feeling that they had to have certainty and transparency, felt they needed details – how much of what was destroyed, and subsequently asked for a timetable of the destruction of the rest of the IRA’s armoury. The IRA does not dance, or want to be seen to dance, to a Unionist tune; in due course they may reveal more but it will already be in the context of a different ball game. This game has already been abandoned. Once again it has been a mismatch. You could say that the Unionists should have trusted more; but they didn’t, it is understandable why they didn’t, and that was that.

Given the fact that all the negotiations were happening behind closed doors, it was all rather disempowering for the ordinary citizen. There was no popular groundswell of support, just quiet waiting. There were no people on the streets demonstrating, no feeling that the politicians had to be pressured by popular support for the process. Rather there was simply waiting for them to get their act together, and that act, in the end, fell apart.

There are things for the ordinary citizen to do in Northern Ireland. We cannot just wait on the politicians to get their act together because that, as we have seen so often, can be waiting for a sandcastle to be built with the tide coming in. Firstly pressure does need to be put on the politicians, through letters, opinions expressed, and voting, but that is only part of an answer. Secondly, we need to be ‘building the alternative now’ by rejecting sectarianism and bringing people together on issues that matter both at a community and a societal level. Thirdly, we need to get our educational systems to deliver either through integrated education or else meaningful interaction across the divide for young people. Fourthly, we need to further develop policing and policing alternatives (mediation, restorative justice) which deal with the thorny issue of law and order so that ceases to be a divisive factor. And fifthly, we need to build the minimal concept of non-violence; not just that violence has not worked in the Troubles but that it was bound to fail, so that we can explore a peaceful future through new and innovative ways of working apart and working together. We take ‘nonviolence’ (without a hyphen) as a further commitment to creative, imaginative, and not-violent means of workings in all aspects of life, including international relations.

That we get the politicians we deserve is a popular adage. Without judging the rights and wrongs of the current situation, until Northern Ireland can move beyond arms-wrestling we will have this up and down, in and out, local government. And even when that gets settled it will not be, as we have said before, the end of history. That will still have plenty of surprises in store for us. Fortunately or unfortunately, the way forward has many twists and turns, ups and downs yet, so may the road rise to meet us.

[Return to related issues of Nonviolent News.]

Copyright INNATE 2014