Loading

Previous editorials

Current editorial

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017

December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016 (supplement)

December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015

December supplement
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014

December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013

December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012

December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011

December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010

December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008

December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006

December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005

December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004

December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
July 200
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002

December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000

16 Ravensdene Park,
Belfast BT6 0DA,
Northern Ireland.
Tel: 028 9064 7106
Fax: 028 9064 7106
Email

 

What's new

Nonviolence News May 2017

Editorials: Korea, A nation once again

Eco-Awareness with Larry Speight: Litter and climate change

Readings in Nonviolence: Museums for Peace

Billy King: Rites Again

 

 

 

 

Editorials

These are regular editorials produced alongside the corresponding issues on Nonviolent News.

Nuclear menaces

[Return to related issue of Nonviolence News]

Ireland, both Northern Ireland and the Republic, can sometimes feel immune to, or outside, many of the threats existing in the world. This is usually a mistaken feeling. There is no more globalised society than Ireland, and if Europe or the world catches a cold then Ireland had better beware. The presence of a Japanese Buddhist monk on a peace pilgrimage to the G8 conference in Fermanagh should remind us of the threat which nuclear weapons and power are to the world. They haven’t gone away you know.

The recently published yearbook from SIPRI gives bad news on this matter (also bad news regarding progress on cluster munitions) and, incidentally, makes a total nonsense of the Nobel Peace Prize presented to President Obama in 2009. As SIPRI states:

“At the start of 2013 eight states—the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan and Israel—possessed approximately 4400 operational nuclear weapons. Nearly 2000 of these are kept in a state of high operational alert....The decrease is due mainly to Russia and the USA further reducing their inventories of strategic nuclear weapons under the terms of the Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (New START) as well as retiring ageing and obsolescent weapons.”

“At the same time, all five legally recognized nuclear weapon states—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States—are either deploying new nuclear weapon delivery systems or have announced programmes to do so, and appear determined to retain their nuclear arsenals indefinitely. Once again there was little to inspire hope that the nuclear weapon-possessing states are genuinely willing to give up their nuclear arsenals. The long-term modernization programmes under way in these states suggest that nuclear weapons are still a marker of international status and power.....”. [See link]

The nuclear menace has been around a long time. It would be (nuclear winter) suicide to use these weapons, apart from any retaliation in kind. But as long as they are considered a marker of status and power there will be others who seek to join the club, and their presence and the possibility of militant military groups getting their own bomb, and holding others to ransom, is a real and present danger.

There has been an old saying in the anti-nuclear movement that unilateralists (people willing to forsake ‘their’ nuclear weapons irrespective of what others do) are multilateralists who mean it. For those who wish to exercise their opposition to nuclear weapons in a focussed and organised way, Irish CND http://irishcnd.org offers one opportunity for people to put their feelings into action. There are many others. The anti-nuclear cause still deserves all the support we can give it and Faslane nuclear base in Scotland is but a stone’s throw away from Ireland, for Fionn Mac Cumhaill anyway. Though come to think of it, he may need decommissioned as well.

Enjoy the G8!
The way Northern Ireland is getting geared up, you would think a terrible onslaught was about to happen; thousands and thousands of police will be on duty, jail wings ready, all sorts of other logistics in place, plus lock down in Fermanagh (and if it doesn’t move or moves slowly in Enniskillen then it has been painted). Much of the reaction is over the top like Queen’s University Belfast closing for the weekend because a family-oriented IF event on world economic justice is happening nearby (the big Belfast demonstration on G8 is nowhere near the university area), and all a long way from Co Fermanagh.

Obviously there has been violence at G8 events in the past but much of that has come from police. There is an impressive programme of alternative events happening, mainly in Belfast but also in Derry, and big demos in Belfast and Fermanagh. As reported in this issue, the details of most of these are at www.fairerworldfestival.org but look out for other events locally.

There are many alternatives to the failed national and global, economic, political and military policies of the G8 governments, and much will be explored in the Fairer World Festival. So, do not be put off by the establishment panic. We can learn from, and enjoy, this opportunity to show we care enough to dare to say – we will have a Gr8 time showing peaceful alternatives to the G8.

David Cameron and the British government chose Co Fermanagh as a good place to hide away the G8 from protesters. But it is to be hoped that the world may see that people in Northern Ireland want a different vision to that inhabiting (or inhibiting) the minds of G8 leaders.

- - - - - -

ECO-AWARENESS ECO-AWARENESS
Larry Speight brings us his monthly column –

The King Leopold Syndrome

King Leopold 11, King of Belgian, was born in 1835, succeeded to the throne in 1865 and died in 1909. He ranks as one of the greediest, cruellest and most manipulative rulers who ever lived. He is best remembered for the founding and exploitation of the Congo Free State, later called Zaire and today known as the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Adam Hochschild in his book King Leopold’s Ghost (2006) estimates that King Leopold was responsible for the death of 10 million people and sanctioned the most barbaric treatment imaginable on the indigenous population including chopping off hands and genitalia, forced labour, the liberal use of the whip, the burning of villages, mass murder and in the process reaped an estimated fortune of a billion dollars in today’s money. In his time he was one of the richest men in the world.

The Netherlands, Germany, France, Portugal and the UK adopted many of Leopold’s methods of control and exploitation. Today we believe we live in more enlightened and compassionate times and think that the avarice, wilful violence and the subjection of whole peoples ended when the European powers withdrew from the countries they had colonized. Although the scale of the tyranny and cruelty of Leopold’s time is a thing of the past the avarice of rich investors, governments, and transnational corporations has not changed. As in Leopold’s Congo avarice causes immense suffering, the early death of millions and widespread environmental destruction.

Today governments and private companies still use military might to gain ownership and exploitive rights in foreign lands. Indonesia has occupied West Papua (previously called Irian Jaya) since 1961, appropriating its wealth, persecuting the indigenous population and laying waste to the environment. Shell Oil has deprived millions of people in the Niger delta of a healthy and sustainable livelihood through the pollution of water and vegetation by way of oil spills, and uses military might to subdue opposition and protect their operations.

Governments, rich elites and international corporations are engaged in a widespread practice known as “land grabbing”, which is colonialism in modern garb. Countries targeted by investors include Argentina, Congo, Ghana, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mozambique, Nigeria, Sudan, and South Sudan. The investor, or land grabbing countries include China, India, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, United Arab Emirates, the UK and the USA. The aim of the land grabbers is to secure food, fuel and other resources for the exclusive benefit of their own populations and economies. An inevitable result of land grabs is the displacement of local people from their lands. The displaced become destitute, and the bioregions are turned into mono-crop deserts. The palm oil plantations in Cameroon and rubber plantations in Cambodia are an example. In regard to the latter 56% of farm land is foreign-owned. (New Internationalist May 2013)

Hochschild (2006) informs us that the “chiefs signed over their land to Leopold, and they did so for almost nothing.” (p. 71) As the New Internationalist, May 2013 reports, this is the case for millions of small-scale farmers today. Hazel Healy quotes Sandrina Muaco a displaced farmer in Mozambique, who voicing the experience of unnamed millions says: “I lost everything.” She was paid $664 by a sugar processing company in compensation for the loss of six hectares of fertile land and her home.

Land activist Diamantino Nhampossa in an interview with New Internationalist informs us of the fate of the dispossessed. “I don’t see any difference between now and the colonialists. ... The companies take land away from you and give you a job. You become a slave on your own land, and then you disappear. That’s what happened in Brazil. What becomes of you? You become forgotten people in slums.”

People in slums have to earn a living and many end up in factories earning 50p for a ten-hour day making clothes for the affluent. The recent tragedy in Dhaka in which over 1,127 people lost their lives when the Rana Plaza building they were working in collapsed highlights the injustice of the international economic order. Most Europeans share with King Leopold the fact that we reap the rewards of the labour, resources and environmental destruction of countries we have never visited. This is the King Leopold Syndrome.

If colonialism is to become a thing of the past, if we want to say we are civilised, we have to be serious about restructuring the international economic order. The forthcoming G8 Summit in County Fermanagh is an opportunity for us to impress upon the G8 leaders the necessity for a new order.

Copyright INNATE 2014